|
Section 1981A(a)(2) provides the same remedies for intentional violations of the federal employee provisions of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 791, and Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. However, damages are not available in disability discrimination cases which involve reasonable accommodation if the respondent "demonstrates good faith efforts, in consultation with the person with a disability," to provide a reasonable accommodation. Section 1981A(a)(3). For example, assume that a respondent consulted with a sight impaired applicant to determine whether any reasonable accommodations exist to enable the applicant to perform this particular job. The applicant informs the respondent that a scanner would reasonably accommodate him. The scanner is very expensive and the respondent believes that a magnifier, backed up by the office secretary as a part-time reader, would reasonably accommodate the applicant. The applicant subsequently files a charge and the Commission concludes that, under the particular circumstances of that job, the magnifier plus part-time reader was not an effective reasonable accommodation. Thus, the Commission concludes that the respondent failed to provide a reasonable accommodation and is therefore liable for discrimination. While the respondent will be liable for backpay and instatement, as appropriate, the Commission will not seek compensatory or punitive damages in this case because the respondent consulted with the complaining party and had a good faith belief that it had provided a reasonable accommodation.
|